Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects. Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects
articles about cults


HOMENewsMembershipConferencesWorkshopse-Library

GroupsStudy GuidesTopicsLinksPeopleOrganizationsArticlesBook Reviews

Info for:Former MembersFamiliesMental HealthResearchEducationClergyPress

CSR Journale-NewsletterBookstore

About ICSADonateContact UsHelp
 

 

 
 

This article is an electronic version of an article originally published in Cultic Studies Journal, 1984, Volume 1, Number 2, pages 156-166. Please keep in mind that the pagination of this electronic reprint differs from that of the bound volume. This fact could affect how you enter bibliographic information in papers that you may write.
 

Mental Health Interventions in Cult-Related Cases: Preliminary Investigation of Outcomes

Steve K. D. Eichel, Ph.D.
Linda Dubrow Marshall, Ph.D.
Roberta Cobrin Eisenberg, M.S.W.


Abstract


Data from 19 cult-related mental health consultations were systematically examined using a modified repeated case study design. The sample consisted of, on the average, white, predominantly college-educated individuals in their late 20’s. Males outnumbered females 2 to 1. The groups represented were almost equally divided between pseudotherapy-oriented, Eastern/meditation oriented and miscellaneous categories. Perhaps due to an overrepresentation of mass therapy groups, this sample seemed older and better educated than other samples. Following a variety of interventions, positive outcomes were reported in 10 of 15 (67%) cases in which outcomes were determined. This study’s limitations include selection bias, investigator paradigm effect, lack of comparison groups, and multiple treatments.
 

Full text available through ICSA E-Library.


Other contributions by author(s)

Article Index
 

 top ^

Live Search

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors.  Copyright ©1997-2012  ICSA, Inc.