This article was published in Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 1,
No. 1, 2002, pp. 3-50. American Family Foundation was renamed
International Cultic Studies Association in 2004.
History of the American Family Foundation
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
The American Family Foundation (AFF) was founded in
Massachusetts in 1979 by Mr. Kay Barney, an engineer and business executive
whose daughter had become involved with the Unification Church.
During the late 1970s several dozen parents’ groups had formed around
the U.S.
Other countries also had
parents’ groups, although there was little international communication at
that time.
Many of the U.S.
organizations became affiliates of the Citizens Freedom Foundation (CFF),
which was chartered around the same time as AFF.
In the early 1980s CFF became the Cult Awareness Network
(CAN), which was ultimately taken over by individuals associated with the
Church of Scientology in 1996, when CAN was driven into bankruptcy because of
litigation.
CAN had been the
object of nearly 50 lawsuits, most filed by individuals associated with the
Church of Scientology.
These organizations came into existence when parents of
usually college-age cult members discovered their mutual concern and decided
to take concerted action.
Some of
these parents lobbied for legislation that would make it easier for parents of
cult members to force their adult children to submit to psychiatric
observation (“conservatorship” legislation); others focused on public and
preventive education by speaking to schools, churches, synagogues, and civic
groups and by telling their stories to journalists.
Many also became proponents of “deprogramming,” a process in which
an adult child would be “snatched” from the street, for example, or lured
to a secure place away from the group’s pressures so that he/she could be
forced to listen to people tell about the negative side of his/her group.
Because so many parents had seen similarities between their
children’s behavior and brainwashed prisoners of war in Korea, cult members
came to be viewed as brainwashed, or “programmed.”
Hence, they coined the term “deprogramming” to describe the process
of bringing somebody out of a cult.
Although
initially “deprogramming” referred to involuntary and voluntary
interventions, by the late 1990s most people used the term to describe
involuntary interventions only, using “exit counseling” to describe
interventions that the group member voluntarily agreed to participate in.
In the late 1970s there were also dozens of Evangelical
ministries concerned about cults, mainly the Mormons and the Jehovah’s
Witnesses.
Some of these
organizations had more than a dozen staff members (e.g., Christian Research
Institute), but most were “mom-and-pop,” volunteer organizations.
They tended to define “cult” in theological terms, so
that any group that was deviant from orthodox Christianity was considered a
cult.
Many of the mainstream
organizations rested on the pioneering work of Evangelical scholar, Dr. Walter
Martin, author of
The Kingdom of the
Cults.
Initially there was little communication between the
Evangelical ministries and the secular parents’ groups.
Over the years, however, communication between the two groups increased
dramatically.
A number of people
now serve on boards of both secular and religious cult educational
organizations.
During the 1970s interest in cults increased
substantially among sociologists of religion.
These sociologists, however, tended to oppose deprogramming and
conservatorship legislation.
They
also appeared to focus on the positive aspects of cults and to downplay the
negative.
As a result, parents’
groups did not see them as resources.
Because
media reports concerning cults focused on the negative, especially after the
Jonestown horror of 1978, sociologists came to prefer the term “new
religious movements” over “cult,” which they had used prior to the
1980s.
Finding little solace among sociologists of religion,
parents turned instead to a handful of mental health professionals who seemed
to be sympathetic to the notion that formerly traditional young people were
indeed changing radically as a result of a group’s persuasiveness.
Most mental health professionals at the time tended to dismiss cult
joining as a transient adolescent rebellion or as an expression of deep-seated
emotional or family conflicts.
But
some mental health professionals, most notably Dr. Margaret Singer in
California and Dr. John Clark in Massachusetts, believed that cult
environments were characterized by socio-psychological forces powerful enough
to radically change the behavior and attitudes of recruits.
How AFF was Different
Mr. Barney believed in the cause that united the diverse
people involved in secular and religious cult education organizations, namely,
the necessity to warn people about and free people from the destructive
controls wielded by certain new groups that were mostly, but not always,
religious.
He also believed,
however, that it was necessary to take a professional perspective, that is, to
study the field scientifically and to apply these findings in a balanced,
responsible manner.
He also
wanted to avoid the internal political debates that took so much time from the
parents’ groups, which were moving toward a national membership
organization.
Therefore, he founded AFF as a nonprofit, tax-exempt
research and educational organization that did NOT have a membership base.
The founding board of directors appointed its successors, thereby
ensuring a relatively smooth succession.
The founding directors included Mr. Barney, Rev. Dr. George Swope, a
minister, Ed Schnee, a concerned parent, and David Adler, a publishing
executive and former group member.
Initially, AFF focused on publishing The Advisor, a bi-monthly newspaper that reported on cult-related
news.
In 1980-81 he expanded
AFF’s activities by formally joining forces with Dr. John Clark and his
colleagues, who included Dr. Michael Langone, current executive director of
AFF, and Dr. Robert E. Schecter, editor of the Cult
Observer.
Dr. Clark, an
Assistant Clinical Professor at Harvard Medical School and Consulting
Psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), was one of the first
prominent mental health professionals to speak out publicly about cult abuses.
He had published a paper, “Cults,” in the Journal
of the American Medical Association in 1979.
Dr. Clark’s team, which had been meeting informally,
brought to AFF the professionalism that Mr. Barney and the founding directors
thought was needed.
Early Years of AFF
In 1981 Dr. Clark’s team obtained several grants from
foundations.
These grants enabled
them to write a monograph, Destructive
Cult Conversion: Theory, Research, and Treatment, in which they proposed a
person-situation model of cult conversion.
This model, based more on the psychology of social influence than
so-called “brainwashing” models, laid the groundwork for AFF’s future
theoretical developments.
The grants also enabled them to set up systems for
responding to the mounting number of information requests from families,
former group members, helping professionals, and the media.
By 1985 AFF was responding to several thousand information
requests (mostly from families and former members) and providing background
information to dozens and sometimes more than 100 journalists annually.
This work was largely dependent upon volunteers, most notably
Carol Turnbull, a long-time financial supporter of AFF.
AFF’s capacity to respond effectively to inquiries has improved over
the years as we have learned more and produced practical books, articles, and
other resources.
Today, most of our communications occur through e-mail,
although the effectiveness of telephone consultations should not be
underestimated.
Appendix A
provides additional information on AFF’s Information Service.
Dr. Clark also set out early on to establish an advisory
board of professionals and scholars.
The
first advisory board meeting, attended by several dozen people, was held in
1981.
(An advisory board meeting
has been held every year since 1981.)
Advisors
included, and continue to include, mental health professionals, attorneys,
academicians, clergy, educators, executives, and former members and family
members active in cult education.
Advisors
help establish goals and objectives for the organization, advise staff on
research and publications, write articles and books, and speak to professional
and lay groups.
Since the first
advisory board meeting, AFF advisors have written among the most prominent
books in this field, many of which are available through AFF’s bookstore.
Appendix B includes a partial list of articles and books published by
AFF and its advisors.
The first advisory board meeting in 1981 identified
AFF’s three-tiered mission of research, education, and victim assistance.
Budget limitations have necessitated that the organization develop
these areas in a cyclic manner:
sometimes
the development focus has been on research; other times on education or victim
assistance.
But attention has
been paid to all three areas throughout AFF’s history.
AFF’s first research survey, conducted in 1983, had a
practical focus, as has most of the research conducted since then.
This survey collected quantifiable data on one of the questions that
most troubled parents and mental health professionals at that time, many of
whom had serious reservations about the deprogramming that was often depicted
as the way to get people out of
cults:
How often does
deprogramming work?
To answer
this question, AFF’s Dr. Michael Langone surveyed 94 parents who had had
their children deprogrammed.
Deprogramming
failed in 37% of the cases, a significant percentage given the legal and
psychological risks of the procedure.
The
study concluded that “deprogramming is but one of several helping options
and should not be viewed as the `cure’ for cult involvement.”
In 1983 Drs. Clark and Langone contributed to a symposium
sponsored by Section K (Social, Economic and Political Sciences) of the
Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science,
entitled, “Scientific Research and New Religions.”
Their paper’s title was: “New Religions and Public Policy: Research
Implications for Social and Behavioral Scientists.”
This symposium was one of the few gatherings that brought
together academicians and professionals from what was already viewed as the
two “camps” of “pro” and “anti” cultists.
Communication between these two “camps” decreased markedly in the
1980s as members of both “camps” were hired as expert witnesses in the
growing number of lawsuits against and by cultic groups.
In the late 1990s, however, AFF reopened dialogue between the two
“camps,” trying as much as possible to encourage openness to
methodological differences among disciplines and to diverse theoretical
orientations, while remaining focused on the irrefutable fact under girding
AFF’s mission:
some groups harm
some people sometimes.
In 1984 AFF markedly advanced the quality of its
publishing efforts by founding the Cult
Observer and Cultic Studies Journal
(CSJ).
The former succeeded The Advisor and focused on press accounts.
It
was printed, however, as a newsletter, rather than a tabloid newspaper.
The latter filled the need for a multi-disciplined, peer-reviewed
journal that was open to critical perspectives on cult issues.
CSJ’s editorial board included helping professionals,
academicians, attorneys, educators, clergy, and business executives.
Over the years CSJ has published more than 160 articles and several
hundred book reviews.
Many of
these articles provide practical help for families, ex-members, and helping
professionals, while others report on scientific research, legal issues,
theoretical speculations, and other subjects.
Several issues were special collections, including Women
Under the Influence (edited by Dr. Janja Lalich), published in 1997.
One of its early issues (Volume 2, Number 2 – 1985)
illustrated well AFF’s continuing mission of bringing together diverse
parties interested in cultic abuses.
This
special issue was entitled, “Cults, Evangelicals, and the Ethics of Social
Influence.”
The issue arose
from conversations AFF staff had had with the staff of InterVarsity Christian
Fellowship, one of the leading Evangelical campus ministries.
InterVarsity strongly supports freedom of religion and the Christian
obligation to preach the Gospel.
But
InterVarsity recognized that sometimes its lay evangelists, who were often
young and inexperienced, lost their ethical bearings and became manipulative
or abusive.
The InterVarsity
staff appreciated Dr. Clark’s statement that in cults we witness an
“impermissible experiment” on the changing of human personality, an
experiment that is “impermissible” because cults violate the unwritten
ethical codes of human social influence.
InterVarsity’s vital contribution to this special issue was to
organize a team of evangelical scholars to come up with an ethical code for
the Christian evangelist.
Rev.
Dr. Robert Watts Thornburg, Dean of Boston University’s Marsh Chapel, later
revised this ethical code with his staff and used it to determine when
criticism of campus religious groups was warranted, as well as to keep their
own house in order.
Other
universities also expressed an interest in the ethical code.
This special CSJ issue also underlined one of AFF’s
enduring themes, namely, the concern about cults rests not on their creeds but
on their deeds, on the unethical ways in which they seek to recruit, retain,
and exploit members.
Wingspread Conference
This theme was emphasized in a landmark conference that
AFF organized in 1985 in conjunction with the Neuropsychiatric Institute of
the University of California at Los Angeles and the Johnson Foundation, which
hosted the conference at its Wingspread campus in Racine, Wisconsin.
This conference brought together 40 individuals, including
representatives from England and Germany.
Among the participants were mental health professionals, clergy,
academicians, journalists, the president of the National PTA, attorneys,
campus administrators, and the Head of the Private Office of Richard Cottrell,
Member of the European Parliament from Bath, England.
The goals of the conference and its recommendations continue to guide
AFF to this day.
The goals were to:
-
examine our level of knowledge about cultic groups and their effects on
individuals, families, and society;
-
identify areas in which scientific studies of cults have been
inadequate; and
-
consider ways in which social policy regarding cults might, without
violating fundamental civil liberties, be changed for the greater protection
of the public.
This Wingspread conference made 21 recommendations
classified under research, education, and law.
The full text of the report was published in Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1986.
Resources for Families
Recognizing that families needed practical, hands-on
books to help them deal with loved ones in cultic groups AFF began in the
mid-1980s to begin work on the first of a series of books aimed at families.
Cults: What Parents
Should Know, published in 1988 was written by former group member and
counselor, Joan Carol Ross, and Dr. Michael Langone.
This book addressed issues of assessment, defining the
problem, communication, planning, and dealing with post-cult difficulties.
In 1992 AFF published the first edition of Carol
Giambalvo’s Exit Counseling: A Family
Intervention.
This book
complemented Cults: What Parents Should Know by providing practical details and
advice for families considering an exit counseling.
Its publication was a landmark event in the supplanting of
deprogramming by noncoercive exit counseling approaches.
A revised, second edition of this book was published in 1996.
In 1996 Livia Bardin, M.S.W. led AFF’s first workshop
for families (these have been held every year since in conjunction with
AFF’s annual meeting).
She
developed a collection of forms to better equip families (and friends) to help
a loved one involved in a cultic group:
Summary
of Changes, Pre-cult Identity Chart, Group Profile, Member’s Present
Situation, Sending Important Messages, Using the Private Language, Listening
and Responding, About the Family, Friends and Family Network, Strategic
Planning Worksheet.
In 2000 she
completed a book based on her workshops and forms,
Coping
with Cult Involvement: A Handbook for Families and Friends.
This
book helps families achieve a level of understanding far deeper than that
provided by other written resources.
Education
AFF initiated a preventive educational program, the
International Cult Education Program (ICEP), in 1987.
ICEP’s goals were to develop educational resources for young
people, educators, and clergy, to encourage educational programs for youth,
and to provide support and guidance to those conducting such programs.
Founded and directed by Marcia Rudin until her retirement in 1997, ICEP
produced two videotapes, Cults: Saying
“No” Under Pressure and After
the Cult: Recovering Together, a book, Cultism
on Campus: Commentaries and Guidelines for College and University
Administrators (revised in 1996 under the title, Cults
on Campus: Continuing Challenge), a lesson plan, a collection of
pseudoscience fact sheets, four educational flyers, and the semi-annual
newsletter, Young People and Cults.
Funding cuts prevent AFF from maintaining ICEP as a distinct program
today, although its functions continue to the extent resources permit.
That many people held AFF’s educational activities in
high esteem became evident in June 1995, when AFF president, Herbert Rosedale
(who has served as president since 1987), was asked to deliver a commencement
address to the graduating class of the State University of New York’s
Institute of Technology at Utica/Rome, “Promises and Illusions.”
This address is printed in Cultic
Studies Journal, 11(2).
In 1987 AFF organized a
special conference on Business and the New Age Movement at the American
Management Association in New York City.
This conference brought together journalists, researchers, and helping
professionals to address the legal, ethical, and mental health controversies
that surrounded certain training programs in business.
As a follow-up to this conference Drs. Arthur Dole, Michael Langone,
and Steve Dubrow-Eichel conducted a series of studies designed to clarify what
is meant by “new age.”
Reports
on these studies were published in Cultic
Studies Journal.
AFF’s
contributions to the examination of cultism’s implications for business were
recognized when AFF’s president, Herbert Rosedale, was appointed in 1992
Executive in Residence at the School of Business, Indiana University.
Mr. Rosedale also gave a talk on new age training programs and business
to the annual meeting of the Association of Private Enterprise Education in
Las Vegas, Nevada in 1996.
In the late 1980s AFF witnessed a spate of Satanism
inquiries arising from what in hindsight was a media craze.
In order to provide guidance to young people and educators, AFF’s Dr.
Michael Langone and Linda Blood began work on a paper. This manuscript,
however, soon grew into a book, which AFF published in 1990.
The book’s goal was to give some professional balance to the subject.
The authors reviewed the relevant professional literature, provided
some historical background, and offered concrete advice for families and
mental health professionals.
The
book also addressed the credibility issue with regard to adult survivors of
ritualistic abuse -- what was to grow into the false memory controversy.
Throughout its history AFF staff and advisors have given
talks at universities and professional associations in order to educate
academicians, students, and helping professionals.
They have also consulted with journalists on hundreds, if not
thousands, of occasions.
Appendix
C provides a list of some of the more noteworthy educational programs and
media outlets to which AFF has contributed.
Project Recovery
In 1990 AFF turned its research focus from families to
former group members, for it had become clear that the majority of former
members approaching AFF for help had left their groups on their own without
any parental intervention.
Many
of these individuals were seriously distressed and needed guidance and
support.
In response to this need
AFF initiated a series of study groups, composed of AFF’s volunteer
professionals (i.e., members of its advisory board, which numbered about 120
by 1990) under the rubric “Project Recovery.”
The following are merely the more noteworthy achievements
that resulted from the work of these study groups:
-
Dr. Edward Lottick’s survey of 1396 primary care physicians in
Pennsylvania, conducted under the auspices of the Pennsylvania Medical
Society.
Among other findings,
this
study reported that 2.2% of
subjects said that either they or an immediate family member had been involved
in a cultic group.
Pennsylvania Medicine (February, 1993) published the results of Dr.
Edward Lottick’s survey.
This
study, combined with other research data, suggests that approximately one
percent, or about two to three million Americans have had cultic involvements.
Since other research suggests that people stay in their groups an
average of about six years, we estimate that several thousand individuals
enter and leave cultic groups each year.
-
In 1992 AFF conducted its first weekend workshop for former
group members at the Stony Point Retreat Center, Stony Point, New York.
At least one weekend workshop has been held every year since, and
one-day ex-member workshops are typically held prior to AFF’s annual
conference.
See Appendix D for a
description of AFF workshops.
-
In 1990 Dr. Langone surveyed 308 former group members from 101
different groups.
The Group
Psychological Abuse Scale (GPA), the first measure of “cultishness,” was
derived from these subjects’ responses to a segment of the questionnaire.
CSJ published a report on the development of the GPA in 1994.
A series of studies in the U.S., England, and most recently Spain have
used or are using the GPA as a measure.
-
Dr. Langone and Dr. William Chambers conducted another survey of
108 ex-members in order to evaluate how they related to different terms and
discovered that ex-members prefer terms such as “psychological abuse” or
“spiritual abuse” to “cult,” “brainwashing,” or “mind
control.”
-
Dr. Paul Martin and his colleagues at the Wellspring Retreat and
Resource Center (a residential treatment center for former group members)
analyzed data Wellspring had collected on 124 clients.
CSJ published a report on this research in 1992.
-
In 1992 in Arlington, Virginia AFF conducted a conference,
“Cult Victims and Their Families: Therapeutic Issues.”
In 1995 AFF conducted a joint conference with Denver Seminary:
“Recovery from Cults: A Pastoral/Psychological Dialogue.”
And in 1996, AFF, in conjunction with Iona College’s pastoral and
family counseling department, conducted a conference, “Recovery from Cults
and Other Abusive Groups:
Psychological
and Spiritual Dimensions.”
-
Under Project Recovery, AFF published AFF
News, a free outreach newsletter directed toward ex-members.
This periodicals function is now fulfilled through AFF’s Web sites
and its free Internet newsletter, AFF
News Briefs.
-
In 1993 Norton Professional Books published AFF’s
Recovery
from Cults, edited by Dr. Michael Langone, a book that the Behavioral
Science Book Service chose as an alternate selection.
This edited book consisted of chapters written by members of the
Project Recovery study groups.
-
In 1993 AFF published Wendy Ford’s book,
Recovery
from Abusive Groups, which provides practical guidelines for individuals
struggling with post-group adjustment issues.
-
In 1994 Hunter House published
Captive Hearts, Captive Minds, written by AFF advisors Madeleine
Tobias and Janja Lalich.
Research Advances
Project Recovery’s research component led to an
important three-day research planning meeting, which was organized by Dr.
Langone and hosted by Dr. Martin and his staff at Wellspring in 1994.
A follow-up meeting was held a year later.
The action recommendations identified at these meetings continue to
guide AFF’s research program.
Appendix
E contains an abridged version of these research meeting reports.
Among those attending these meetings were two teams of
graduate students from Pepperdine University and Ohio University, working
under Dr. David Foy and Dr. Steve Lynn, respectively.
These students later completed several dissertations and
independent research studies (some published in Cultic Studies Journal) relevant to goals of the research plan
enunciated at these meetings.
Some
of this research was reported in a paper presented to the American
Psychological Association’s Division 36, Psychology of Religion in 1996.
Other research was reported on at other professional meetings.
In 1995 Boston University named AFF’s Dr. Langone the
1995 Albert Danielsen Visiting Scholar.
In
this capacity, he conducted a research study that compared former
members/graduates of a cultic group and two mainstream religious groups on (a)
members’ perceptions of group abusiveness, and (b) psychological distress.
This study’s design was a direct result of the research planning
meetings conducted at Wellspring.
In 1994 AFF, with the Cult
Awareness Network and the Cult Hot Line and Clinic of the New York Jewish
Board of Family & Children’s Services, funded and received a special
report from the American Bar Association’s Commission on Mental and Physical
Disability Law:
“Cults in
American Society:
A Legal
Analysis of Undue Influence, Fraud and Misrepresentation.”
This report, published in Cultic
Studies Journal in 1995, reflected AFF’s desire to support legal
research with practical implications for former group members.
In 1996 AFF published The
Boston Movement: Critical Perspectives on the International Churches of Christ
(second edition published in 1998).
Edited
by AFF’s Carol Giambalvo and Herbert Rosedale, this book provided historical
background, personal accounts and analytical chapters on the group about which
AFF had received more inquiries than any other during the 1990s.
Resource Guide
As the number of resources -- books, articles, pamphlets,
videos, lesson plans -- available through AFF grew, it became necessary to
describe all of these resources in one document.
Thus, in 1998 AFF published Cults
and Psychological Abuse: A Resource Guide (revised in 1999).
This 119-page book provided brief suggestions for general inquirers,
families, ex-members, current members, mental health professional, legal
professionals, educators, students, clergy, and occult-ritual abuse inquirers.
It also included 18 essays and checklists on topics ranging from “On
Using the Term `Cult’” to “How Can Young People Protect Themselves
Against Cults.”
The book also devoted 36 pages to describing AFF’s books, reports, information packets,
videos, preventive education resources, CSJ reprint collections, and
individual CSJ article reprints.
This
resource guide demonstrates how far AFF has come since its founding, when
there were virtually no resources for people concerned about cult
involvements.
Conferences
AFF has organized conferences since its founding.
In recent years AFF’s conferences have become increasingly
international in scope and larger with respect to the number of programs
available to attendees.
Until
1998 all AFF conferences took place in the Northeast between Washington D.C.
and Boston, which is where the bulk of AFF’s supporters live.
But in 1998 AFF decided to move out of that geographical base by
organizing a conference in Chicago.
In
1999 the annual conference took place in Minnesota; in 2000 in Seattle.
Then in 2001 the conference returned to the Northeast, to Newark, New
Jersey.
In 2002 the annual
conference will head south for the first time and will take place in Orlando,
Florida from June 13-15th.
The 2001 conference had approximately 270 attendees and
nearly 70 speakers.
Attendees
came from two dozen countries, including China, South Africa, Russia, and
Brazil.
Approximately 40
attendees came from foreign countries.
A
three-track organization was employed so that during most periods attendees
could choose from research, victim assistance, and international/legal
programs.
As with other annual conferences during the 1990s, this
year’s conference included two preconference workshops, one for families and
one for ex-members.
Next year’s
conference, which will also have three tracks and family and ex-member
workshops, will also include a preconference workshop for mental health
professionals.
The Web:
AFF’s Future
AFF’s Web site was first posted on the Internet in
1995.
Begun initially through the
volunteer efforts of Patrick Ryan, AFF’s Web site,
www.csj.org,
grew considerably over the years.
It
now has over 1000 pages of material.
It
won a number of awards, including:
-
A three-star rating by Mental Health Net, the largest catalog of
mental health, psychology, and psychiatry resources online.
-
A review The Web Crawler, one of the main Internet indexes,
which reviews very few web pages.
-
Inclusion in the Britannica
Internet Guide (http://www.ebig.com).
The Internet has markedly changed how AFF functions.
Until the late 1990s AFF traditionally depended upon journalists to get
our message out.
Most people who contacted us found out about us either
through word of mouth or from a newspaper article.
Today, because so many people, including nearly all journalists, are on
the Web, more than 90% of the people who directly contact us -- usually by
e-mail -- for the first time found us on the Web.
Inquirers come from all over the world.
Indeed, inspection of our Web site’s statistics reveals
that during a typical week the site will be visited by more than 10,000 people
from about 70 countries.
Through the Internet more people can take advantage of
AFF’s resources in a couple of months than during the prior 20 years.
For this reason AFF decided several years ago to
transform the organization so as to make it Internet-based.
This has been a daunting and unpredictably time-consuming
endeavor, for the transformation must occur while we continue to do all the
work we have traditionally done – without any increase in manpower.
We have made a great deal of progress.
For example, all Cultic Studies Journal
articles and book reviews are now available in electronic format.
With a few clicks of a mouse and within a few seconds we can send five
CSJ reprints to an inquirer in Ceylon.
We
are gradually converting past issues of Cult
Observer to electronic format.
When
this project is completed, we will be able to e-mail about 4000 articles on
more than 1000 different groups as easily as we can now send CSJ articles. We
are also looking into methods of making such material available on the Web.
In addition, we have collected and filed in our electronic folders more
than 13,000 newspaper articles on more than 2000 groups.
Our goal is to put together an electronic library that will have these
resources as well as selected books, articles from journals other than our
own, and even videos.
How rapidly
we progress toward the completion of this goal will depend upon how generously
our supporters continue to donate.
We are also developing new Web
sites.
In 2000 a special grant
enabled us to launch a project that seeks to use the Internet to provide
spiritual and religious seekers, youth in particular, with resources reviewed
and recommended by an ecumenical advisory board of experts.
AFF's partner in this project is the Center for Youth Studies in
Hamilton, Massachusetts, directed by Rev. Dean Borgman, the Charles E.
Culpepper Professor of Youth Ministries at Gordon-Conwell Theological
Seminary.
This project resulted
from our observation that cultic and other dubious groups often project a more
sophisticated Web presence than mainstream religions.
Such observations are especially troubling given that research
indicates that 4% of the more than 8,000,000 teens who use the Internet do so
for religious reasons and 16% of teens say the Internet will substitute for
their current church experiences within the next five years (see “Teenage
Spirituality and the Internet” in this issue).
We believe that it is
important to develop and effectively market a Web site that will direct
seekers to credible information sources that will not exploit or mislead them.
This project revolves around a Web site, faithresource.org, which
contains, or will contain, the following sections, in addition to information
on the sponsoring organizations and the project's advisory board:
-
Religion Showcase - Provides lists of Web sites, books,
articles, periodicals, organizations, and other resources on the world's major
faith traditions and the major branches of Christianity.
-
Spiritual Abuse - Directs visitors to AFF's Web site and other
resources focusing on the ways in which spiritual seekers can be exploited,
manipulated, and abused.
-
Religion News - Directs visitors to credible Web and print
resources specializing in religious news.
-
Newsletter - Provides visitors with a free newsletter that
informs them about changes to the site, events of note, and, ultimately,
conferences and workshops that faithresource.org might conduct.
-
Interactive Web forums for youth - If this project continues to
be funded, faithresource.org will, to the extent resources permit, answer,
through e-mail, young persons' questions about religion, spirituality, and
spiritual seeking.
Over time a
Question-and-Answer Index will be developed and kept on the Web site for the
benefit of all visitors (inquirers' identities will, of course, remain
anonymous).
Project staff will
answer questions, but, in a form of peer review, the staff's answers will not
be posted until they have been reviewed and approved by at least two expert
advisors.
Other interactive
forums will also be explored.
Currently, this project is more or less on hold, for the
seed grant expired in the summer of 2001.
We hope, however, to refund it in 2002 and continue its development.
In 2002 AFF merged Cultic
Studies Journal and Cult Observer
into the journal in which this article is published, Cultic Studies Review: An Internet Journal of News, Research, and
Opinion (CSR).
Although
designed as an Internet journal, CSR has a print version for those supporters
not yet online, libraries, and those supporters who believe that cyberspace
can never substitute for the heft of paper in the hand.
We decided to merge the two periodicals in order to make more efficient
use of manpower and to take advantage of the Internet’s immunity to printing
and postage costs.
CSR is
supplemented by AFF’s free electronic newsletter, AFF
News Briefs, which also includes a print version.
The newsletter provides limited group news, announcements of
upcoming events, brief essays, and news on the activities of researchers and
cult educators around the world.
CSR is supplemented by AFF’s latest Website, www.CulticStudies.org.
This site complements (and may eventually supplant) www.csj.org.
CulticStudies.org has rebuilt and greatly expanded the quantity and
quality of free information that has been available on www.csj.org.
It also links to a special AFF bookstore Website, which is
database driven and much more effective than what was formerly on www.csj.org.
Thoughts on the Future
Although AFF has grown remarkably since its founding, two
vital elements of the organization have remained constant:
-
A focus on professionalism and research aimed at helping those harmed
by cultic involvements and forewarning those who might be harmed in the
future.
-
Continuity of leadership, management efficiency, and financial
discipline.
AFF’s enduring focus on professionalism, its
administrative efficiency and effectiveness, and the hard work and dedication
of its volunteer professionals have resulted in the following general
achievements:
-
A remarkable increase in the quantity and quality of information
available to families, former group members, helping professionals, and
others.
-
A more nuanced articulation of the cult phenomenon.
This journal’s name and the new Website’s name, “CulticStudies.org,”
for example, emphasize that we do not see the issue that concerns us in
black-and-white terms, “cult” and “not cult.”
We see a wide range of groups that change over time and reveal a
spectrum of “cultishness.”
-
Much higher levels of understanding within professional communities,
especially mental health and education.
-
Increased communication internationally and between the so-called
“camps” of cultic studies.
AFF’s day-to-day work over the next several years is
likely to revolve around the following programs:
-
Publication of
Cultic Studies
Review, AFF News Briefs, and
books.
-
Providing information to Website visitors and e-mail, phone, and snail
mail inquirers.
-
Updating existing Websites and developing a comprehensive electronic
library.
-
Conducting and/or supporting scientific research studies, as financial
resources permit.
-
Organizing an annual conference and workshops for families, ex-members,
and mental health professionals.
-
Working with and supporting volunteer professionals who will continue
to contribute to professional publications and to lecture on this subject.
Although AFF’s mission has remained constant, the
methods it employs to fulfill that mission have changed with the times.
Most of our “space,” for example, now consists of dancing
electrons; we use considerably fewer “square feet” of physical space to
operate than was the case in 1981.
Although raising enough money to do what needs to be done
is as difficult as ever, the nature of our support has changed over the years.
We are still dependent upon several large contributions.
However, we are not nearly so dependent as we were 15 years ago.
Small donations, subscriptions, and purchases now constitute more than
60% of our income, compared to about 20% in the early 1980s.
The people who contribute to AFF have also changed,
although many stalwarts – volunteers and financial supporters -- have stayed
with us from the beginning. In
1979 most of the energy behind AFF came from parents of the cult-affected.
Today, most of that energy comes from former group members, especially
those who have gone on to get advanced degrees after recovering from their
group experience.
These former
group members will develop the new and refined conceptual models and will
conduct the research studies that will carry the cultic studies field to a
higher level of understanding.
AFF began as one man’s vision to apply scientific
methods to the problems of people hurt by groups that deceive, manipulate, and
exploit in the name “love.”
This
has been and will continue to be a difficult task, for the problems that
motivate us to action are not easy to define with precision and are difficult
to study scientifically.
But
AFF’s history demonstrates that this task is not impossible, however
difficult.
Much has been learned;
many people have been helped.
Nevertheless,
much work remains, and many more people will need help.
Appendices
Appendix A:
AFF Information
Service
People who seek information or assistance from AFF are
typically concerned about groups that appear to be disturbingly manipulative
and/or exploitative.
Many people
use the term, "cult," to describe such groups.
Other terms include "new religious movement,"
"charismatic group," "high intensity group," and
"sect."
In order to
communicate effectively and respond to inquirers' needs AFF uses the term,
"cult," which appears to be the preferred term among those concerned
about a group.
However, we
emphasize to inquirers that this term has limited utility.
We recommend that all inquirers read the essay, "On
Using the Term `Cult.’"
We also recommend that inquirers read other essays and suggestion
sheets available on this site, including information on resources for various
categories of inquirers:
families/relatives,
former group members, current group members, mental health or medical
professionals, legal or law-enforcement professionals, educators, students,
and clergy.
Most inquirers want information on a specific group that
troubles them.
Often, we can
provide information (our files include at least one article on more than 3000
groups).
But in other cases we
know of no information on a specific group or have very little information.
Sometimes we can find information through diligent searches of written
and electronic resources and AFF's network of volunteer professionals. Even
when we have or can find information on a group, however, this information by
itself does not usually help inquirers determine what to do about their
concerns.
That is why AFF has
developed resources that help inquirers understand how groups can manipulate,
exploit, and harm individuals and what to do to address this harm.
Groups may vary greatly in their beliefs and practices
(e.g., eastern mystical, Bible-based, psychotherapy, political, New Age,
commercial).
Those that cause
concern, however (and it is important to keep in mind that many nontraditional
groups do not arouse concern), tend to influence their members through
subtle psychological processes that are strikingly similar from group to
group.
In order to understand a
person's group involvement well enough to help that person, whether that
person be a family member, friend, client, or oneself, it is vital to
understand these processes of psychological influence.
Superficial journalistic reports may validate one's concern about a
particular group, but they rarely provide much insight into how that group may
harm people -- frequently with the best of intentions -- or what one can do to
help that person.
Those who want
a deeper understanding of how a particular group may have adversely affected a
person or family often turn to AFF.
AFF has studied psychological manipulation and cultic
groups for more than 20 years.
This
research base, which is continually updated, informs all that we do to help
inquirers.
Through its Family
Education Service, AFF provides the following types of assistance for families
and individuals:
-
Books, periodicals, audiovisual resources, periodical reprints,
and other reports.
-
Information on specific groups and guidance and/or assistance on
how to find information that is not readily available.
-
An annual conference and special workshops for former group
members and for families.
-
An Information Line, which can help inquirers clarify their
concerns, identify additional resources that may help them, and identify
action options. Limited follow-up consultation may be available in some cases.
The Information Line number is
239.514.3081.
Dr. Michael D. Langone supervises AFF's Family Education
Service.
Carol Giambalvo is the
principal consultant for AFF's Cult Information Line.
Biographical sketches follow.
Carol Giambalvo
is a former group member who has been a Thought Reform Consultant since 1984
and is a cofounder and president of reFOCUS, a national support network for
former cult members.
She is
director of AFF’s recovery programs, and is responsible for its Project
Outreach.
She has coordinated
AFF's workshops for former group members since 1989.
Ms. Giambalvo is the author of Exit
Counseling: A Family Intervention, co-editor of The Boston Movement: Critical Perspectives on the International Churches
of Christ, co-author of Ethical
Standards for Thought Reform Consultants, and a contributing author to Recovery
from Cults, Today's Destructive Cults and Movements, and Spiritual
Counterfeits Journal. Ms. Giambalvo has lectured extensively on
cult-related topics and has appeared on a number of television programs on the
subject, including Oprah, Canadian
Broadcasting Network's Fifth Estate, Inside Edition, and The Today Show. She has
been interviewed for many magazine articles, newspaper, and radio programs.
Michael
D. Langone, Ph.D., graduated in
Counseling Psychology in 1979 from the University of California Santa Barbara,
where he was a Regents Fellow for three years.
He received a B.A. in Romance Languages and Literatures, Magna Cum
Laude with Distinction, from Boston University in 1969. In
1995 Boston
University named him the Albert V. Danielsen Visiting Scholar.
Since 1981 he has been the Executive Director of AFF and the editor of Cultic
Studies Journal since its inception in 1984.
Dr. Langone is the co-author of Cults:
What Parents Should Know (with Joan C. Ross) and Satanism
and Occult-Related Violence (with Linda Blood).
He is the editor of Recovery
From Cults: Help for Victims of Psychological and Spiritual Abuse (a
Behavioral Book Service selection) and has authored numerous articles in
professional journals and books, including Psychiatric
Annals, Business and Society Review,
Sette e Religioni (an Italian
periodical), Grupos Totalitarios y
Sectarismo: Ponencias del II Congreso Internacional (the proceedings of an
international congress on cults in Barcelona, Spain), Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Sourcebook, Handbook
of Psychiatric Consultation with Children and Youth, Psychiatric
News, and Cultic Studies Journal.
Dr. Langone has spoken widely to dozens of lay and professional groups,
including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific
Division, American Group Psychotherapy Association, American Psychological
Association, the Carrier Foundation, various university audiences, and
numerous radio and television stations, including the MacNeil/Lehrer News Hour
and ABC 20/20.
Appendix B: Articles and Books
The following is a partial
list of publications produced or commissioned by AFF or published by its staff
and advisors.
The first section
includes a list of articles published in AFF's scholarly Cultic Studies
Journal.
These
reprints can be purchased in our Web Bookstore.
We then provide a supplementary list of selected books and articles
published by AFF staff and advisors.
CSJ Reprints
|
Title/Author
|
|
|
CSJ Vol.1. No. 1
|
|
|
Women,
Elderly, and Children in Religious Cults.
Marcia
Rudin.
|
|
|
Brainwashing and the Moonies.
Geri Ann Galanti, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Avoiding the Extremes in Defining the Extremist Cult.
Stephen M. Ash, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Deprogramming An Analysis of Parental Questionnaires. Michael
D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Family
Perspectives on Involvements in New Religious Groups.
Lawrence B. Sullivan, Ph.D.
|
|
|
CSJ
Vol.1. No. 2
|
|
|
Training Issues for Cult Treatment Programs.
David Halperin, M.D.
|
|
|
Cults and Children: The Abuse of the Young.
A. Markowitz, C.S.W. & D.
Halperin, M.D.
|
|
|
Mental
Health Interventions in Cult-Related Cases: Preliminary Investigation of
Outcomes.
Steve
K. Dubrow-Eichel, Linda Dubrow-Eichel, & Roberta Cobrin Eisenberg.
|
|
|
Preventive Education on Cultism for High School
Students: A Comparison of Different Programs' Effects on Potential
Vulnerability to Cults.
Andrea
Bloomgarden & Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Counseling and Involvements in New Religious Groups.
Lawrence
Bennett Sullivan, Ph.D.
|
|
|
On Resisting Social Influence.
Susan Andersen, Ph.D. &
Philip Zimbardo, Ph.D.
|
|
|
CSJ
Vol.2. No. 1
|
|
|
Psychotherapy
and the "New Religions": Are They The Same?
Daniel Kriegman, Ph.D. & Leonard Solomon, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Some
New Religions Are Dangerous.
Arthur
A. Dole, Ph.D. & Steve K. Dubrow-Eichel.
|
|
|
Cult-Induced Psychopathology, Part I: Clinical Picture.
Stephen
M. Ash, Psy.D.
|
|
|
Cults
Go To High School: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Initial Stage
in the Recruitment Process.
Philip
G. Zimbardo, Ph.D. & Cynthia F. Hartley.
|
|
|
Cult Involvement: Suggestions for Concerned Parents and
Professionals.
Michael
D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
|
CSJ
Vol.2. No. 2
|
|
|
Introduction
to Special Issue: Cults, Evangelicals, and the Ethics of Social Influence.
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Shepherding/Discipleship: Theology and Practice of
Absolute Obedience.
Linda
Blood.
|
|
|
Campus Crusade: Youth Ministers Find Public High School
Campuses to be a Fertile Field for Missionary Endeavor.
Hope Aldrich.
|
|
|
Autobiography
of a Former Moonie.
Gary
Scharff.
|
|
|
Why Evangelicals are Vulnerable to Cults.
Rev. Dr. Harold Bussell.
|
|
|
The Perils of Persuasive Preaching.
Rev. A. Duane Litfin.
|
|
|
Selections from the Second Vatican Council's
Declaration on Religious Freedom.
|
|
|
New Organizations Operating Under the Protection
Afforded to Religious Bodies.
Resolution
of the European Parliament.
|
|
|
Statement of Evaluation Regarding Maranatha Campus
Ministries, Maranatha Christian Ministries, Maranatha Christian Church.
A Committee of Evangelical Theologians.
|
|
|
Guidelines
for Opus Dei in Westminister Diocese.
Cardinal
Basil Hume.
|
|
|
Resolution on Missionaries and Deprogramming.
Department of Interreligious Affairs, United American Hebrew
Congregations.
|
|
|
Disciple Abuse.
Rev. Gordon MacDonald.
|
|
|
How to Talk to People Who are Trying to Save You.
Rev. Dr. Ross Miller.
|
|
|
Introduction to Contributions of the Inter-Varsity
Team.
Dietrich Gruen.
|
|
|
Prologue:
The
Evangelicals Set Forth Their Case.
Dietrich
Gruen.
|
|
|
A Code of Ethics for the Christian Evangelist.
|
|
|
Ethical Evangelism, Yes!
Unethical Proselytizing, No!
Rev. Dr. Gordon Lewis.
|
|
|
What is Evangelism?
Mark McCloskey.
|
|
|
Evangelism:
Persuasion
or Proselytizing?
M. McCloskey.
|
|
|
The Ethics of Persuasion in a Pluralistic Culture.
M.
McCloskey.
|
|
|
An
Ethic for Christian Evangelism. R.
Johannesen,
Ph.D.
|
|
|
A Hypothetical Example.
Dietrich Gruen.
|
|
|
Religious Freedom at Secular Schools.
John W. Alexander.
|
|
|
Of Cults and Evangelicals: Labeling and Lumping.
Ronald Enroth, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Christian Evangelism and Social Responsibility: An
Evangelical View.
Rev. Dr.
Joseph M. Hopkins.
|
|
|
Religious Pluralism, Dialogue, and the Ethics of Social
Influence.
Rev.
Dr. Eugene C. Kreider.
|
|
|
Evangelization and Freedom in the Catholic Church.
Rev.
James J. LeBar.
|
|
|
A Catholic Viewpoint on Christian Evangelizers.
Rev. Dr. James E. McGuire.
|
|
|
Ethics in Proselytizing: A Jewish View.
Rabbi Ralph D. Mecklenburger.
|
|
|
Evangelicals
and Cults.
Marcia
Rudin.
|
|
|
Objectionable Aspects of "Cults": Rhetoric
and Reality.
Thomas
Robbins, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Cults, Evangelicals, and the Ethics of Social
Influence.
Michael
D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
|
CSJ
Vol.3. No. 1
|
|
|
Attacks on Peripheral versus Central Elements of Self
and the Impact of Thought Reforming Techniques.
Richard Ofshe, Ph.D. & Margaret Thaler Singer,
Ph.D.
|
|
|
“Mind Control" and the Battering of Women.
Teresa Ramirez Boulette,
Ph.D. & Susan Andersen, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Charismatic Covenant Community: A Failed Promise.
Adrian J. Reimers.
|
|
|
Charismatic Leadership: A Case in Point.
Natalie Isser, Ph.D. &
Lita Linzer Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
|
|
The Spiritual Crucible: A Critical Guide to America's
Religious/Cultic Renaissance.
David
Christopher Lane.
|
|
|
Sects or New Religious Movements: A Pastoral Challenge
The
Vatican Report on Cults.
|
|
|
Cultism:
A
Conference for Scholars and Policy Makers.
Report of Wingspread Conference.
Louis J. West, M.D. & Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
|
The Use of Transcendental Meditation to Promote Social
Progress in Israel.
Mordecai
Kaffman, M.D.
|
|
|
Reducing Conflict and Enhancing Quality of Life in
Israel Using the Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi Program: Explanation
of a Social Research Project.
Charles
N. Alexander, Ph.D. & David W. Orme-Johnson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
CSJ
Vol.3. No. 2
|
|
|
Cultism and American Culture.
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D
|
|
|
The Rabbi and the Sex Cult: Power Expansion in the
Formation of a Cult.
Richard
Ofshe, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Parental Responses to Their Children's Cult Membership.
Lita
Linzer Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
|
My Experience in YWAM: A Personal Account and Critique.
Laurie
Jacobson.
|
|
Some Hazards of the Therapeutic Relationship.
Jane W. Temerlin, M.S.W.
& Maurice K. Temerlin, Ph.D.
|
|
The Utilization of Hypnotic Techniques in Religious
Conversion.
Jesse
S. Miller, Ph.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.4. No. 1
|
|
Some Rigors of Our Times: The First Amendment and Real
Life and Death.
One ACLU Member
Looks at Guyana, Nazis, and Pornography.
Fay
Stender, Esq.
|
|
Comments on Stender Article.
George Driesen, Peter N. Georgiades.
|
|
Psychoanalysis and Cult Affiliation: Clinical
Perspectives.
David
Halperin, M.D.
|
|
The Cult Appeal: Susceptibilities of the
"Missionary Kid."
Margaret
W. Long, Ph.D.
|
|
Teaching Students Who Already Know the Truth.
David McKenzie, Ph.D.
|
|
A Comment on McKenzie.
Ronald Enroth, Ph.D.
|
|
Reply to Enroth.
David McKenzie, Ph.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.4. No.2/Vol.5 No.1
Double Issue
|
|
Cult Vs. Non-Cult Jewish Families: Factors Influencing
Conversion.
Mark
Sirkin, Ph.D. & Bruce A. Grellong, Ph.D.
|
|
Family Environment as a Factor in Vulnerability to Cult
Involvement.
Neil
Maron, Ph.D.
|
|
Creating the Illusion of Mind Reading in a
Self-Transformation Training.
Robert
C. Fellows, M.T.S.
|
|
"Reject the Wicked Man" - Coercive Persuasion
and Deviance Production: A Study of Conflict Management.
Jerry Paul McDonald.
|
|
Litigating the Cult-Related Child Custody Case.
Randy Francis Kandel, Esq.
|
|
Confessions of a Cult Watcher.
Ronald Enroth, Ph.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.5. No. 2
|
|
Trouble in Paradise: Some Observations on Psychotherapy
with New Agers.
Steve
& Linda Dubrow-Eichel.
|
|
Psychotherapy with Ex-Cultists: Four Case Studies and
Commentary.
L.
Goldberg, M.S.W. & W. Goldberg, M.S.W.
|
|
Psychotherapy of a Casualty from a Mass Therapy
Encounter Group: A Case Study.
Anita
O. Solomon, Ph.D.
|
|
Ritualistic Abuse of Children: Dynamics and Impact.
Susan
J. Kelley, R.N., Ph.D.
|
|
Authority:
Its
Use and Abuse - A Christian Perspective.
Floyd McClung, Jr.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.6. No. 1
|
|
Coerced Confessions: The Logic of Seemingly Irrational
Action.
Richard
Ofshe, Ph.D.
|
|
Social Influence: Ethical Considerations.
Michael
Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
Legal Analysis of Intent as a Continuum Emphasizing
Social Context of Volition. Herbert L. Rosedale, Esq.
|
|
State of Israel Report of the Interministerial
Committee Set Up to Examine Cults ("New Groups") in Israel.
|
|
Litigating Child Custody with Religious Cults. Ford
Greene, Esq.
|
|
Cults and Children: The Role of the Psychotherapist. David
Halperin, M.D.
|
|
Family Responses to a Young Adult's Cult Membership and
Return. Lorna Goldberg, M.S.W & William Goldberg, M.S.W..
|
|
CSJ
Vol.6. No. 2
|
|
Deprogramming: A Case Study.
Steve Dubrow-Eichel, Ph.D.– special issue
|
|
CSJ
Vol.7. No. 1
|
|
Cults and the European Parliament: A Practical
Political Response to an International Problem.
David Wilshire, MA, MP.
|
|
Prosecuting an Ex-Cult Member's Undue Influence Suit.
Lawrence Levy, J.D.
|
|
The New Age Movement: Fad or Menace?
Arthur Dole, Ph.D., Michael
Langone, Ph.D., & Steve Dubrow-Eichel, Ph.D.
|
|
The Involvement of College Students in Totalist Groups:
Causes, Concerns, Legal Issues, and Policy Considerations.
Gregory Blimling, Ph.D.
|
|
Reintegration of Exiting Cult Members with their
Families: A Brief Intervention Model. Kevin Crawley, Diana Paulina,
M.Ed., & Robert White, L.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.7. No. 2
|
|
Psychotherapy Cults.
Margaret T. Singer, Ph.D., Maurice Temerlin, Ph.D.,
& Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
Persuasive Techniques in Contemporary Cults: A Public
Health Approach.
Louis
J. West, M.D.
|
|
Cult Violence and the Identity Movement.
Thomas J. Young, Ph.D.
|
|
The False Transformational Promise of Bible-Based
Cults: Archetypal Dynamics.
Nadine
Craig, M.A. & Robert Weathers, Ph.D.
|
|
Deprogramming:
A
Case Study - Part II: Conversation Analysis.
Steve K. Dubrow-Eichel, Ph.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.8. No. 1
|
|
Cult Formation.
Robert Jay Lifton, M.D.
|
|
The Effect of Religious Cults on Western Mainstream
Religion.
Marcia
Rudin, M.A. & Rabbi A. James Rudin, M.A.
|
|
The Historical Dimension of Cultic Techniques of
Persuasion and Control.
Lita
Linzer Schwartz, Ph.D.
|
|
Residential Treatment: The Potential for Cultic
Evolution.
David
A. Halperin, M.D. & Arnold Markowitz, M.S.W.
|
|
Cults in Court.
Sarah Van Hoey.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.8. No. 2
|
|
Conversion, Religious Change, and the Challenge of New
Religious Movements. Johannes Aagaard, Ph.D..
|
|
Why Cultic Groups Develop and Flourish: A Historian's
Perspective.
Natalie
Isser, Ph.D.
|
|
Ritual Child Abuse: Understanding the Controversies.
David
Lloyd, Esq.
|
|
Outreach to Ex-Cult Members: The Question of
Terminology.
Michael
Langone, Ph.D. & William Chambers, Ph.D.
|
|
Interesting Times.
Kevin Garvey & Linda Blood.
|
|
Task Force Study of Ritual Crime.
Michael Maddox, Esq. &
the Virginia State Crime Commission.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.9. No. 1
|
|
The Cadre Ideal: Origins and Development of a Political
Cult.
Janja
Lalich.
|
|
Psychiatric Problems in Ex-Members of Word of Life.
Gudrun Swartling, O.T.
& Per G. Swartling, M.D.
|
|
The Council of Europe's Report on Sects and New
Religious Movements.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.9. No. 2
|
|
Psychotherapy Cults: An Ethical Analysis.
Kim Boland & Gordon
Lindbloom, Ph.D.
|
|
Cults, Coercion, and Contumely.
M. Singer, Ph.D. & M.
Addis.
|
|
The Appeal of the Impossible and the Efflorescence of
the Unbelievable: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Cults and Occultism.
David A. Halperin, Ph.D.
|
|
Psychological Abuse.
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
Post-Cult Symptoms as Measured by the MCMI Before and
After Residential Treatment.
Paul
R. Martin, Ph.D., Michael D. Langone, Ph.D., Arthur A. Dole, Ph.D., &
Jeffrey Wiltrout.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.10. No. 1
|
|
Undue Influence in Contract and Probate Law.
Abraham Nievod, Ph.D., J.D.
|
|
Undue Influence and Written Documents: Psychological
Aspects.
Margaret
Thaler Singer, Ph.D.
|
|
The Dark Underside: Cultic Misappropriation of
Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis.
David
Halperin, M.D.
|
|
Cult Conversion, Deprogramming, and the Triune Brain.
Geri-Ann Galanti.
|
|
Is the New Age Movement Harmless?
Critics vs. Experts.
A. Dole, Ph.D., M. Langone,
Ph.D., & S. Dubrow-Eichel, Ph.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.10. No. 2
|
|
Introduction to special issue, "A Dialogue with Dr.
Johannes Aagaard."
Paul K.
Eckstein.
|
|
Symposium with Johannes Aagaard.
|
|
Pluralism, Deeds, Creeds, and Cults.
Michael Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
An Exit Counselor's Perspective.
David Clark.
|
|
Religious Recoding.
Rev. Walter Debold.
|
|
Returning to Cosmology: The Logic of the Discussion and
the Language of the Soul.
Paul
K. Eckstein.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.11. No. 1
|
|
Strongly Held Views About the New Age: Critics Versus
Experts.
Arthur
Dole, Ph.D. & Michael Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
God's Company: New Age Ethics and the Bank of Credit
and Commerce International.
Paul
Heelas, Ph.D.
|
|
Never Say Die.
Jeanne Marie Laskas.
|
|
The Experience of the SPES Foundation: Some Remarks on
the Different Attitudes Toward New Religious Movements in Argentina and in
Europe.
Jose
Maria Baamond, Ph.D.
|
|
Cults in Latin America.
Alfredo Silletta.
|
|
More Than the Devil's Due.
Adrian J. Reimers, Ph.D.
|
|
The Group Psychological Abuse Scale: A Measure of the
Varieties of Cultic Abuse.
William
Chambers, Ph.D., Michael Langone, Ph.D., Arthur Dole, Ph.D., & James
W. Grice.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.11. No. 2
|
|
Lustful Prophet: A Psychosexual Historical Study of the
Children of God's Leader, David Berg.
Stephen A. Kent, Ph.D.
|
|
Psychological Issues of Former Fundamentalists.
James C. Moyers.
|
|
Promises and Illusions: A Commencement Address.
Herbert L. Rosedale, Esq.
|
|
Sleep Deprivation.
Jean-Louis Valatx.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.12. No. 1
|
|
Cults in American Society.
American Bar Association Commission on Mental and
Physical Disability Law.
|
|
Judgment by the Fukuoka (Japan) District Court on the
Unification Church.
|
|
Expanding the Groupthink Explanation to the Study of
Contemporary Cults.
Mark
N. Wexler, Ph.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.12. No. 2
|
|
Clinical Case Studies of Cult Members.
Arthur
Dole, Ph.D.
|
|
Personality, Belief in the Paranormal, and Involvement
with Satanic Practices Among Young Adult Males.
Stuart M. Leeds.
|
|
Secular and Religious Critiques of Cults: Complementary
Visions, Not Irresolvable Conflicts.
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
|
|
Women and Cults: A Lawyer's Perspective.
Herbert Rosedale, Esq.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.13. No. 1
|
|
Legal Decision: Borawick v. Shay.
|
|
Commentary on Borawick v. Shay: The Fate of
Hypnotically Retrieved Memories.
Alan
W. Scheflin, Esq.
|
|
Commentary on …Borawick v. Shay: Hypnosis, Social
Influence, Incestuous Child Abuse, and Satanic Ritual Abuse: The Iatrogenic
Creation of Horrific Memories for the Remote Past.
Robert A. Karlin, Ph.D., & Martin T. Orne, M.D.,
Ph.D.
|
|
Ethical Standards for Thought Reform Consultants.
Carol Giambalvo, Joseph
Kelly, Patrick Ryan & Madeleine Landau Tobias.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.13. No. 2
|
|
Pseudo-identity and the Treatment of Personality Change
in Victims of Captivity and Cults.
Louis J. West, M.D. & Paul Martin, Ph.D.
|
|
Psychosocial Evaluation of Suspected Psychological
Maltreatment in Children and Adolescents.
American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children.
|
|
Group Influence and the Psychology of Cultism Within
Re-evaluation Counseling: A Critique.
Dennis Tourish, M.Sc., Ph.D. & Pauline Irving,
M.Sc., Dip. C.G., C.Psych., Ph.D.
|
|
The Threat to Entrepreneurial Freedom and Initiative
Posed by "New Age" Management Training Programs.
Herbert L. Rosedale, Esq.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.14. No. 1
|
|
Introduction:
“We Own Her Now.”
Janja
Lalich.
|
|
Dominance
and Submission: The Psychosexual Exploitation of Women in Cults.
Janja Lalich.
|
|
Gender
Attributes That Affect Women’s Attraction to and Involvement in Cults.
Shelly Rosen.
|
|
Mothers
In Cults: The Influence of Cults on the Relationship of Mothers to Their
Children.
Alexandra
Stein.
|
|
Sex,
Lies, and Grand Schemes of Thought in Closed Groups.
A Collective of Women.
|
|
No
Place to Go: Life in a Prison Without Bars.
Katherine
Betz.
|
|
Wifely
Subjection: Mental Health Issues in Jehovah’s Witness Women.
Kaynor J. Weishaupt & Michael D. Stensland.
|
|
Working
with Women Survivors of Cults: An Empowerment Model for Counselors.
Penny Dahlen.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.14. No. 2
|
|
Hypnosis
and the Iatrogenic Creation of Memory: On the Need for a Per Se Exclusion of
Testimony Based on Hypnotically Influenced Recall.
Robert
A. Karlin & Martin T. Orne.
|
|
False
Memory and Buridan’s Ass: A Response to Karlin and Orne.
Alan W. Scheflin.
|
|
The
Individual Cult Experience Index: The Assessment of Cult Involvement and Its
Relationship to Postcult Distress.
Nadine
Winocur, Jonibeth Whitney, Carol Sorenson, Peggy Vaughn, & David Foy.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.15. No. 1
|
|
Women,
the Law, and Cults: Three Avenues of Legal Recourse—New Rape Laws, Violence
Against Women Act, and Antistalking Laws. Robin A. Boyle, J.D.
|
|
Ideological
Intransigence, Democratic Centralism, and Cultism: A Case Study from the
Political Left. Dennis Tourish, Ph.D.
|
|
Residence
Halls and Cults: Fact or Fiction? Russell K. Elleven, Ed.D., Carolyn W. Kern,
Ph.D., & Katherine Claunch Moore
|
|
A
Comment on the Debate Between Scheflin and Karlin and Orne on the
Admissibility of Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony.
Gilbert C. Hoover, IV, Esq.
|
|
In
Favor of a Per Se Exclusion of Hypnotically Influenced Testimony: A Reply to
Hoover.
Robert A. Karlin, Ph.D.
and Martin T. Orne, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
Brief
Report: Perceived Psychological Abuse and the Cincinnati Church of Christ.
Donna L. Adams
|
|
CSJ
Vol.15. No. 2
|
|
Special
Collection. Recovery From Cults: A Pastoral/Psychological Dialogue –
Personal Accounts
|
|
Moments of Grace.
Nancy Miquelon
|
|
Nothing Need Go to Waste. Patrick Knapp
|
|
From Counterfeit to Truth: A Personal Quest.
Carson Miles
|
|
Bible-Cult Mind Control. David Clark
|
|
Overcoming
the Bondage of Revictimization: A Rational/Empirical Defense of Thought
Reform. Paul R. Martin, Ph.D., Lawrence Pile, Ron Burks, & Stephen Martin
|
|
Cult
Experience: Psychological Abuse, Distress, Personality Characteristics, and
Changes in Personal Relationships Reported by Former Members of Church
Universal and Triumphant.
Irene
Gasde, Richard Block, Ph.D.
|
|
CSJ
Vol.16. No. 1
|
|
How
Childlren in Cults May Use Emancipation Laws to Free Themselves.
Robin A. Boyle
|
|
Psychological
Distress in Former Members of the International Churches of Christ and
Noncultic Groups.
Peter T.
Malinoski, Michael D. Langone, & Steven Jay Lynn
|
|
In
Good Faith: Society and the New Religious Movements, Summary Report.
Swedish Government Commission
|
|
CSJ
Vol. 16. No. 2
|
|
Shipwrecked
in the Spirit: Implications of Some Controversial Catholic Movements.
Judith Church Tydings
|
|
Comment
on "Shipwrecked in the Spirit": An Urgent Pastoral Concern.
Michael Duggan
|
|
Proposing
a "Bill of Inalienable Rights" for Intentional Communities.
Benjamin Zablocki
|
|
How
Should the Communities Movement Handle Questions of Abuse? Responding to
Benjamin Zablocki's Proposed "Bill of Rights."
Laird Sandhill
|
|
Comment
on Leeds (1995).
Paul Cardwell,
Jr.
|
Other Articles and Books (Selected)
American
Family Foundation.
(1999).
Cults
and psychological abuse: A resource guide.
Bonita Springs, FL: American Family Foundation.
Andersen,
S., (1985). Identifying coercion and deception in social systems.
In B. Kilbourne (Ed.),
Scientific
Research and New Religions:
Divergent
Perspectives.
American
Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific Division,
12-24.
Appel, W.
(1983).
Cults in America:
Programmed for paradise.
New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Aronoff,
J.B., Lynn, S. J., & Malinoski, P.T. (2000). Are cultic environments
psychologically harmful? Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 91-111.
Bardin, D.
(April 19, 1994). Psychological coercion & human rights:
Mind control (“brainwashing”) exists.
Cult Abuse Policy &
Research
Bardin, L.
(2000). Coping with cult involvement: A handbook for family and
friends.
Bonita Springs, FL:
American Family Foundation.
Burks, R.,
& Burks, V.
(1996).
Damaged
disciples: Casualties of authoritarian churches and the shepherding movement.
Bussell, H.
(1994).
By hook or by crook.
New
York:
McCracken Press.
Chambers, W.,
Langone, M. & Malinoski, P., (1996, August 12). The Group Psychological
Abuse Scale.
(Paper presented to
Division 36 of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.)
Cialdini, B.
Robert.
(1984). Influence: How and why people agree to things. William Morrow.
Clark, J. G.
(1979). Cults.
Journal of the
American Medical Association, 242, 179-181.
Clark, G.
(1978).
Problems in referral of
cult members.
NAPPH Journal, 9(4).
27-29.
Clark, J. G.,
& Langone, M. D. (1984).
The
treatment of cult victims.
In N.
R. Bernstein & J. Sussex (Eds.), Handbook of child psychiatry
consultation.
New York: SP
Medical and Scientific Books.
Clark, J. G.,
Langone, M. D., Schecter, R. E., & Daly, R. C. B.
(1981). Destructive cult conversion: Theory, research, and
treatment.
Weston, MA:
American Family Foundation.
Dole, A. A., Is
the New Age dangerous to youth:
Critics
vs. experts? (1994). Poster Presented at the International Association for
Applied Psychology.
Dole, A. A.,
New Age terms rated for harmfulness:
Experts
vs. critics. (1995).
Poster
Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of American Psychological
Association.
Dole, A. A.,
Some conceptions of the New Age. (1993).
Journal of Religion and Health.
32(4)
261-275.
Dole,
Arthur, & Dubrow-Eichel, Steve.
(1981).
Moon over academe.
Journal of
Religion and Health, 20, 35-40.
Enroth, R.
(1993).
Churches that abuse.
Grand Rapids, MI:
Zondervan.
Enroth, R.
(1995).
Recovery from churches that abuse.
Grand Rapids, MI:
Zondervan.
Eisenberg, G.
(Ed.).
(1988).
Smashing the
idols: A Jewish inquiry into the cult phenomenon.
Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Ford, W.
(1993).
Recovery from abusive
groups.
Bonita Springs, FL:
American Family Foundation.
Giambalvo, C.
(1992). Exit counseling: A family intervention.
Bonita Springs, FL: American Family Foundation.
Giambalvo, C.,
& Rosedale, H. L.
(1996). The
Boston Movement: Critical perspectives on the International Churches of
Christ. Bonita Springs, FL: American Family Foundation.
Goldberg, L.,
& Goldberg, W.
(1982). Group
work with former cultists.
Social
Work, 27, 165-170.
Halperin, D.
(1982).
Group processes in cult
affiliation and recruitment.
Group,
6(2), 13-24.
Halperin, D.
(1983).
Psychodynamic
perspectives on religion, sect, and cult.
Boston: John Wright.
Halperin, D.
(1990).
Psychiatric perspectives
on cult affiliation.
Psychiatric
Annals, 20(4), 204-218.
Hochman,
J.
(1989). Iatrogenic symptoms
associated with a therapy cult: Examination of an extinct "new
psychotherapy" with respect to psychiatric deterioration and
"brainwashing."
Psychiatry,
47, 366-377.
Hochman,
J.
(l990). Miracle, mystery, and
authority:
The triangle of cult
indoctrination.
Psychiatric
Annals, 20,179-187.
Isser,
N., & Schwartz, L. L. (1988).
The history of conversion and
contemporary cults.
New York:
Peter Lang.
Keiser,
T., & Keiser, J. (1987).
The
anatomy of illusion. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Lalich,
J.
(Ed.). (1998). Women under
the influence. Special issue of
Cultic Studies Journal, 14(1).
Landa,
S.
(1991). Children and cults:
A practical guide.
Journal
of Family Law, 29(3), 591-634.
Langone,
M. D.
(1989). Beware of "New
Age" solutions to age old problems.
Business and Society Review, 69, 39-42.
Langone, M. D.
(1990.
Working with cult-affected
families.
Psychiatric Annals,
20(4), 194-198.
Langone,
Michael D.
(1991). Assessment and
treatment of cult victims and their families.
In P. Keller (Ed.),
Innovations in clinical practice:
A source book (Volume 10).
Sarasota (FL):
Professional
Resource Exchange.
Langone,
M. D. (Ed.). (1993).
Recovery from Cults: Help for victims of psychological
and spiritual abuse.
New York: W.
W. Norton.
Langone,
M. D. (1996).
Clinical Update on
Cults.
Psychiatric Times.
Langone,
M. D. (1996).
An investigation of
a reputedly psychologically abusive group that targets college students: A
report for Boston University's Danielsen Institute.
Langone,
Michael D., & Blood, Linda.
(1990).
Satanism and occult-related violence:
What you should know.
Weston,
MA:
American Family Foundation.
Langone, M.
D., & Clark, J.
(1985). New
religions and public policy: Research implications for social and behavioral
scientists.
In B. Kilbourne
(Ed.), Scientific research and new religions: Divergent perspectives.
American Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific Division, 90-114.
Langone,
M. D., & Martin, P. R.
(1993,
Winter).
Deprogramming, exit counseling, and ethics:
Clarifying the confusion.
Christian
Research Journal, 46-47.
LeBar,
J., Burtner, K., Debold, W., & McGuire, J.
(1989). Cults, sects, and the New Age.
Huntington, IN:
Our Sunday
Visitor Press.
Lottick,
Edward A.
(1993). Survey reveals
physicians' experience with cults.
Pennsylvania
Medicine, 96(2), 26-28.
Markowitz,
Arnold.
(19983, August).
Jews in cults.
Moment,
22-28.
Markowitz,
Arnold.
(1989). A cult hotline
and clinic.
Journal of Jewish
Communal Services, 4, 56-61.
Martin,
P. R.
(1989, Winter/Spring).
Dispelling the myths:
The
psychological consequences of cultic involvement.
Christian Research Journal, 9-14.
Martin, P. R.
(1993).
Cult-proofing your
kid.
Grand Rapids, MI:
Zondervan.
Nieburg, H.,
& Langone, M. D.
(1994).
Psychosocial aspects of cults and Satanism.
Academy Forum, 38, 1-2.
Ofshe, R.
(1992).
Coercive persuasion and
attitude change.
In E. Borgatta
& M. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology, 212-224.
Rosedale, H.
L., Kisser, C., & Singer, M. T.
(1993,
March 30).
Statements to the
Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of
Representatives.
Rosedale, H.
L., & Langone, M. D.
(1998).
On using the term "cult."
In
American Family Foundation,
Cults and psychological abuse: A resource
guide.
Bonita Springs, FL:
American Family Foundation., 22-28.
Ross, J. C.,
& Langone, M. D. (1988).
Cults:
What parents should know. New York: Lyle Stuart.
Rudin,
M.
(Ed.). (1991). Cults on campus: Continuing challenge.
Weston, MA:
American
Family Foundation.
Rudin, M.,
& Rudin, A. J. (1980).
Prison
or paradise: The new religious cults.
Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Sirkin, M.
(1990). Cult involvement: A systems approach to assessment and
treatment.
Psychotherapy, 27,
116-123.
Sirkin, M.,
& Wynne, L.
Cult involvement
as relational disorder.
Psychiatric
Annals, 20, 204-218.
Singer, M. T.
(1979, January).
Coming out of
the cults.
Psychology Today,
72-82.
Singer, M. T.
(1986).
Consultation with
families of cultists.
In L. C.
Wynne, S. H. McDaniel, & T. T. Weber (Eds.), The family therapist as
consultant. New York: Guilford Press.
Singer, M. T.
(1987). Group psychodynamics.
In
R. Berkow (Ed.), The Merck Manual of diagnosis and therapy (15th
edition, psychiatry section).
Rahway,
NJ: Merck, Sharp and Dohme.
Singer, M. T.
(1992).
Cults.
In S. B. Friedman, M. Fisher, & S. K. Schonberg (Eds.).
Comprehensive adolescent health care.
St. Louis, MO:
Quality
Medical Publishing, Inc.
Singer, M. T.,
& Lalich, J. (1995).
Cults
in our midst.
Jossey-Bass.
Singer, M. T.,
& Lalich, J.
(1997).
Crazy
therapies.
Singer, M. T.,
& Ofshe, R. (1990).
Thought
reform programs and the production of psychiatric casualties.
Psychiatric Annals, 20(4), 188-193.
Temerlin, M.,
& Temerlin, J. (1982). Psychotherapy cults: An Iatrogenic perversion.
Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 131-141.
Tobias, M. L.,
& Lalich, J.
(1994). Captive
Hearts, Captive Minds.
Alameda,
CA:
Hunter House.
West,
L. J.
(1989).
"Brainwashing," behavioral control and the risk of harm.
Prepared for the American Bar Association's National Institute on Tort
and Religion, program titles: Tort Liability for Brainwashing: A Debate.
West, L. J.
(1990, July; 1991, May; 1991, October).
Psychiatry
and Scientology.
The Southern
California Psychiatrist.
Whitsett, D.
P.
(1992). A self-psychological
approach to the cult phenomenon.
Clinical
Social Work Journal, 20(4), 363-375.
Appendix C: Educational Programs and Media Contacts
AFF conferences have been held in Seattle,
Minneapolis-St. Paul, Chicago, Philadelphia, New York, Hartford, Boston,
Washington, D.C. and Denver.
The
following list is but a sample of the organizations for which AFF staff and
advisors have conducted professional education programs.
American Psychiatric
Association
American Group Psychotherapy Association
American Psychological Association (at least 6 programs)
American Sociological Association
Eastern Psychological Association
New England Psychological Association
American Counseling Association
American Association for the Advancement of Science,
Pacific Division
U.S. Psychiatric and Mental Health Congress
National Institute of Health
Michigan Mental Health Association
University of Pennsylvania
University of San Francisco
Stanford University
City University of New York
New York City’s New School
SUNY Utica/Rome
Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
University of Hartford
University of Vermont
UCLA
University of Southern California
University of Denver
University of Saskatoon
Savannah State College
Mt. Sinai Medical School
First and Second International Congresses on Cults
(Barcelona, Spain)
School of Business, Indiana University.
Baylor College of Medicine
Boston University.
Amherst College
University of Massachusetts
Denver Seminary
Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
Carrier Foundation
Massachusetts General Hospital
State University of New York’s Institute of Technology
at Utica/Rome (commencement address)
Iona College
Association of Private Enterprise Education
Renfrew Foundation
New School
Cornell University
University of Florida
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Texas A & M University
State University of New York, Purchase College.
University of Pittsburgh
University of South Florida, Fort Myers
Society for the Scientific Study of Religion
Listed below are media organizations that have consulted
AFF on cult-related stories.
This
is only a partial list, for our staff was not always able to enter a written
record of conversations with journalists.
Moreover, AFF advisors also speak extensively to journalists,
and do not always keep a record.
It
should be noted that many media organizations contact us many times over the
years.
CNN
New York Times
CBC
Newsweek
Nippon
TV
Congressional
Quarterly
Researcher
The
London Times
The
Today Show
The
McLaughlin Group
CBS
World News
Psychiatric
Times
TV
2 Denmark
McNeil/Lehrer
Report.
Pittsburgh
Sunday Tribune-Review
Wisconsin State
Journal
Geraldo Show
Discovery Channel’s Justice Files
St. Paul Pioneer
Press
Providence
Journal-Bulletin
Chicago Tribune
Jewish Action
Current Health:
The Continuing Guide to Health Education
New York Post
NBC Nightly News
Essence Magazine
Dunne
Productions
Link Magazine
Boulder Daily
Camera
German Life
Magazine
The Eagle
Christian
Research Journal
Stern TV
ABC
News-–Primetime Live
German Media
Group
CNBC-TV
Manhattan Spirit
VBS News, Before
Your Eyes
NBC News
Detroit News
LA Opinion
Ft. Worth Star
Telegram
Good Day
NY News Section
The Rolanda Show
(TV)
WIBW-Radio (Kansas)
CBS 48-Hours
The Advocate
Staten Island
Advance
KNBC-TV
Scholastic
Magazine
Microsoft
Sidewalk
Fortune Magazine
Episcopal
Diocese of Central Florida Magazine
People Magazine
KALX-Radio
(Berkeley)
WISH-TV
(Indianapolis)
Home News and
Tribune (NJ)
Black
Entertainment TV
KRON,
California
Enterprise-Mountaineer
(NC)
Mademoiselle
Cosmopolitan
Magazine
ABC
Primetime-Live
Albuquerque
Journal
Cybertimes (NY
Times online publication)
Elle Magazine
Pioneer
Press/Knight Ridder Chain
Dateline NBC
NYU Student
Newspaper
Facts on File
News Services
The Journal
Media One (Chicago)
True Vision
Productions
BBC Inside Story
Self Magazine
The Wall Street
Journal
South China
Morning Post
King-TV
(Seattle, WA)
Tampa Security
Report
Washington Post
The Leeza Show
Jewish TV
Network (Los Angeles)
The Muskogee
(OK) Daily Phoenix
German Radio
Network
Chicago Daily
Herald
The Teagle (TX)
CNN-Washington
Rockland (NY)
Journal News
Westchester-Ganette
Newspaper Chain
Sunday Greenwich
(CT) Times.
ABC TV News
Campus Security
Report
Hard Copy
KTRS
Radio, Detroit
Residence Life
Magazine
Rolling Stone
Scholastic
Magazine
Star Magazine
WMUZ
Radio, Detroit
Westchester
Newspapers
Pittsburgh
Sunday Tribune-Review
CBS-60 Minutes
Philadelphia
Inquirer
NHK Japanese TV
Life Magazine
Fortune Magazine
BBC Inside Story
South China
Morning Post.
Associated Press
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Boston Globe
Calgary Herald
Charlotte Observer
DNET News
Dallas Morning News
Denver Post
Fox News, Inside Edition
Japan Times
Los Angeles Times
Univision
Miami Herald
New York Post
PBS News
Philadelphia Weekly
Religion News Service
Reuters
Rocky Mountain News
South China Morning Post
St. Petersburg Times
Toronto Star
Variety
Washington Jewish Week
U.S. News & World Report
Appendix D:
AFF Workshops
AFF offers regularly scheduled and specially arranged
small-group workshops for former members of abusive groups, and the families,
spouses, and friends of people involved in abusive groups.
The workshops offer extensive interaction between workshop leaders and
participants.
Typically, 10-25
people will participate.
The workshops provide practical information and a healing
atmosphere for individuals struggling with the sometimes long-term
aftereffects of an abusive group experience or the confusion, frustration, and
fear that people often experience when a loved one becomes involved in an
abusive group.
All sessions are led by individuals knowledgeable about
group psychological abuse and the special needs of former members of abusive
groups and family and friends concerned about group members or former members.
Some workshops are a part of AFF conferences. For information on
upcoming workshops, contact AFF.
Ex- Member Workshops
These workshops are for former group members only, not
family or friends (AFF has other workshops for these persons).
Topics discussed typically include:
-
The nature of psychological manipulation and abuse
-
Conditions of thought reform programs
-
General recovery needs of former members
-
Coping with depression and guilt
-
Effects of hypnosis and trance techniques
-
Coping with feelings of anger
-
Coping with anxiety
-
Decision-making
-
Reestablishing trust in yourself and others
-
Dependency issues
-
The grieving process
-
Reintegration/identity issues
-
Spiritual and philosophical concerns
The workshops are organized and coordinated by Carol
Giambalvo, a thought reform consultant, former member of a controversial
group, and author/editor of Exit
Counseling: A Family Intervention and The
Boston Movement: Critical Perspectives on the International Churches of Christ
(Herbert L. Rosedale, co-editor).
Ms.
Giambalvo serves AFF as Director of Recovery Programs, which include
workshops, special publications, professional liaison, and outreach.
Family Workshops
Topics discussed typically include:
-
The nature of psychological manipulation and abuse
-
Why people join and leave high-control, abusive groups
-
How to assess your situation
-
How to communicate more effectively with your loved one
-
Problem-solving
-
Formulating a helping strategy
-
When exit counseling might be appropriate and how to prepare
-
Ethical issues
-
Special concerns of spouses
-
How to help your loved one after he or she leaves the group
-
How to cope with apparent helplessness without losing hope
AFF Family Workshops are organized and coordinated by
Livia Bardin, M.S.W., a therapist in private practice.
Ms. Bardin serves on AFF’s Social Work Committee and Family
Education Service Advisory Board and is editor of the newsletter of the
Greater Washington Society of Clinical Social Workers.
She is author of Coping with Cult Involvement: A Handbook for
Families and Friends.
Appendix E:
Research Plan
One of AFF’s most important goals
is to inspire, encourage, coordinate, support and contribute to research
initiated by AFF staff, volunteer professionals, and others who are interested
in the cult problem.
In September
1994 AFF's Dr. Michael Langone organized a two-day research-planning meeting
in which 16 professionals convened to discuss ongoing and planned research.
A second meeting took place in April 1995.
Wellspring Retreat and Resource Center hosted both meetings.
The research outline below summarizes the results of these meetings and
subsequent discussions with AFF research advisors.
This outline continues to guide our research work.
(In order to enhance scientific clarity the term, “psychologically
abusive group,” is used instead of “cult,” with which considerable
ambiguity and controversy is associated.)
Although much useful research has been conducted, fully implementing
this ambitious research plan will take many years.
Those
interested in contributing to the research program outlined below should
contact Dr. Langone (AFF, P.O. Box 2265, Bonita Springs, FL 34133;
mail@icsamail.com).
The questions that guide our
research follow:
1. How can we productively conceptualize the term “psychologically
abusive group” and the relevance of certain types of “harm,” “group
variables,” and “person variables” to psychologically abusive groups?
Answering this
question will require a series of conceptual essays [one of which, Dr.
Langone’s essay “Psychological Abuse,” has already been published in Cultic Studies Journal, 9(2), 1992] that will lay the groundwork
for a psychological theory of group-perpetrated psychological abuse.
This theory should clearly imply empirical studies that can test the
theory’s validity.
2. How can we productively measure group psychological abuse and relevant
group, person, and harm variables?
Drs. William Chambers, Michael
Langone, and Arthur Dole developed the 28-item Group Psychological Abuse Scale
(GPA Scale) from a factor analysis of the responses of 308 subjects rating
their groups on 112 questions [Cultic
Studies Journal, 11(1), 1994].
The
GPA Scale needs to undergo a full course of psychometric development,
including reliability and validity studies and the collection of data from a
wide range of cultic and noncultic groups.
If the GPA Scale lives up to its promise, it should prove useful in
distinguishing cultic from noncultic groups and in differentiating various
types of cultic groups.
It will
provide, for the first time, an objective measure of the “cultishness” of
a group.
Drs. Langone and Chambers
presented a paper with Ohio University graduate student, Peter Malinoski to
the American Psychological Association.
This
paper, which is available from AFF, summarizes research with the Group
Psychological Abuse Scale (GPA) through 1996.
Dr. Rod Marshall and Lois
Kendall of Buckinghamshire College in London gave an updated report on their
research, which used the GPA along with other instruments, at AFF's annual
conference in Seattle, April 28-29, 2000 (they gave a report at the 1999
conference as well).
Other
researchers are also collecting or analyzing data involving the GPA.
Despite the GPA Scale’s
promise, it is also desirable to supplement the self-report GPA with other
self-report scales and observational measures of psychologically abusive group
environments. In regard to the first goal, Dr. Nadine Winocur developed a
related scale as part of her doctoral dissertation at Pepperdine University.
She and her colleagues report on the Individual Cult Experience Index
in Cultic Studies Journal, 14(2),
1997.
Because of the complexity
of the second goal, the first step will be to write a carefully thought out
methodological essay on issues to consider in developing observational
measures of abusive groups.
In testing the GPA, AFF has
found that families of individuals involved in cultic groups also find the
scale useful.
In order to meet
their needs more effectively AFF would like to develop a companion scale for
families.
This scale will explore
how families are affected by and perceive cultic groups.
Research conducted at Ohio
University, Boston University, Buckinghamshire College, and Wellspring Retreat
and Resource Center have utilized a battery of standardized psychological
instruments to assess harm in populations of former group members.
See Question 4 below.
3. How can we usefully classify psychologically abusive groups?
It would be helpful to write a
critical review of existing classification systems, including those proposed
by sociologists (An “unassigned” task at present).
The psychometric development of
the GPA Scale may lead to an empirically based classification scheme.
4. With regard to psychologically abusive groups, what is the relationship
between person variables, group variables, and psychopathology?
AFF’s Executive Director, Dr.
Michael Langone, whom Boston University named the 1995 Albert V. Danielsen
Visiting Scholar, conducted a study at Boston University of the International
Churches of Christ movement.
He
used the GPA Scale and a new scale (the DDD Scale—Deception, Dependency, and
Dread Scale) to assess the abusiveness of the Boston Movement, as rated by
former members.
He also used a
psychological test battery to assess the nature and degree of psychological
distress experienced by former members of the Boston Movement and two
comparison groups: graduates of a mainstream campus ministry and former
members of a mainstream religion.
This
test battery is identical to that used in an Ohio University study described
below. Dr. Langone's report to the Danielsen Institute is available from AFF.
A team of three psychology
graduate students under the direction of Ohio University’s Dr. Steve Lynn
gave a standardized test battery to clients of the Wellspring Retreat and
Resource Center and a matched comparison group of college students in order to
assess the nature and degree of psychopathology among former cult members.
A report on this research was published in Cultic
Studies Journal, 16(1), 1999. Members of this team also wrote a
comprehensive review of the empirical literature in this field [Aronoff, J.B.,
Lynn, S.J., & Malinoski, P.T. (in press).
Are cultic environments psychologically harmful?
Clinical Psychology Review].
The Marshall and Kendall
studies, mentioned above, are also using a standardized battery to assess
harm.
A team of four psychology
graduate students under the direction of Pepperdine University’s Dr. David
Foy have used the Los Angeles Symptom Checklist (a standardized instrument
designed to measure symptoms common to victimization populations) to measure
distress and the Group Experience Index (GEI) to assess the severity of
exposure to cult-related pressures and abuses in order to study the
relationships between post-cult distress and variables related to pre-cult
history and adjustment, cult-related experiences, and post-cult history.
A multiple regression research design was used to evaluate
the relative contributions of the variables under investigation to post-cult
distress.
The Winocur article
mentioned above also reports on this aspect of these studies.
Data from the AFF questionnaire
from which the GPA Scale was derived await analyses and reporting by Dr.
Langone and colleagues. This questionnaire explored subjects’ psychological
and social history, background variables related to cult joining,
characteristics of the group environment, subjects’ responses to the cult
experience, subjects’ post-group experiences (including recovery), and
subjects’ evaluations of helping resources.
Dr. Arthur Dole has written a
methodological paper, published in Cultic
Studies Journal, 12(2), 1995, explaining how to apply case study
methodology to the cult area.
Over
the next few years, AFF would like to enlist the support of clinicians in this
field to conduct a series of case studies using Dr. Dole’s methodology.
Although considerable research
has been conducted, much more research is needed to adequately answer this
question.
5. What is the prevalence of membership in psychologically abusive groups
and how many such groups are there in the United States?
The first research-planning
meeting decided that existing prevalence data are sufficient for current
research purposes and that a full-scale epidemiological study on cultic groups
would be an inappropriate use of limited resources at this time.
It was decided, however, that surveys of professional populations
(e.g., clergy, psychologists), such as Dr. Edward Lottick’s survey of
primary care physicians [Lottick, E. A. (Feb. 1993).
Survey reveals physicians' experiences with cults. Pennsylvania
Medicine, 96, 26-28 -- available from AFF], would provide useful data at
relatively low cost (and would also contribute to professional education).
Such surveys will be conducted as funds allow.
Scientifically determining the
number of psychologically abusive groups, or cults, in the U.S. is a daunting
task.
Perhaps the most feasible
approach would be to compile a comprehensive list of groups about which AFF
receives inquiries, select a random sample from this list, and conduct
in-depth studies of this sample, using when possible the GPA Scale and/or
other scales to be developed in the future.
This study would enable us to make reasonable and empirically based
generalizations about the broad population of groups we receive inquiries on
(e.g., what percentage appears to be abusive).
This study obviously will require considerable funding.
Develop a methodology for
assessing the nature and extent of cultic influence on a university campus.
AFF believes that if we could develop an effective and efficient survey
instrument, colleges and universities could use this instrument to help them
assess cult-related problems on their campuses.
Dr. Russell Eleven's research, which was published in Cultic
Studies Journal, 15(1), 1998, has laid the groundwork for the development
of such a measure.
6. What is the relationship between person, group, and treatment variables
and amelioration in post-group distress?
Currently, the most thorough
outcome evaluation of psychological treatment for former group members is that
of Dr. Paul Martin and his colleagues at Wellspring Retreat and Resource
Center, published in Cultic Studies
Journal, 9(2), 1992.
Although
controlled outcome studies are obviously preferred, such studies require
considerable funding.
In the
meantime, the state of knowledge would be advanced if other clinicians in this
field attempted to evaluate treatment effectiveness using standardized pre-
and post-measures, as Wellspring does.
7. What are the legal implications of the cult phenomenon?
The American Bar Association
report published in Cultic Studies
Journal, 12(1), 1995 provides a
literature review and analysis of case law relating to mind control issues,
undue influence, and fraud.
Cultic Studies Journal has also published articles on other aspects
of the legal dimension of this subject, including custody, violence against
women laws, emancipation of minors, hypnotic testimony, and certain reports of
governments.
The international
dimension of the cult issue greatly complicates the legal arena.
It would be helpful to develop a manual of pertinent laws, precedents,
and unresolved issues in various countries in order to make the scholarly
analysis above accessible to greater numbers of people.
Obviously, this is a major task that would require funding and the
skills of a legal scholar.
8. What are the cultural implications of the cult issue?
AFF believes that the cultural
implications of cultism can be explored fruitfully by answering the following
key question:
How
does a free, constitutionally based society protect itself against the
totalist impulses and practices of cultic groups without becoming closed and
repressive?
The answer to this question
includes, but is not limited to, legal considerations.
A key component of the answer, for example, has to do with the ethics
of how we influence each other, a subject on which AFF has published a number
of articles.
Answering this
question also demands an analysis of fundamental societal values and how
conflicting values can most effectively be reconciled.
|