Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects. Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects
articles about cults

HOMENewsMembershipConferencesWorkshopse-Library Infoe-Library Logone-Library Search

New SurveyEx-Member/others

GroupsStudy GuidesTopicsLinksPeopleOrganizationsArticlesBook Reviews

Info for:Former MembersFamiliesMental HealthResearchEducationClergyPress

CSR Journale-NewsletterBookstoreProducts

About ICSADonateContact UsHelpSearch

Site Feedback

 

 
 

This article is an electronic version of an article originally published in Cultic Studies Journal, 1987, Volume 4, Number 1, pages 78-84. Please keep in mind that the pagination of this electronic reprint differs from that of the bound volume. This fact could affect how you enter bibliographic information in papers that you may write.


A Reply to Ronald Enroth's Comment on "Teaching Students Who Already Know the Truth"

David McKenzie, Ph.D.

Berry College


I appreciate Professor Enroth's careful reading of and provocative response to my article on fundamentalism in the classroom. As I understand it, he has two basic objections to what I have written: one, that my critique is on the side of relativism and thus flies in the face of the recent academic concern for the consequences of such a position; and two, that I have generalized throughout my article in such a way as to overlook fundamentalists who are genuinely intellectual in their faith and fine academicians to boot. The first of these objections misses the point and is by and large irrelevant, as I shall attempt to show. The second is quite to the point and partly correct, though I shall insist in some important respects, incorrect.

Full text available through ICSA E-Library.

 


Other contributions by author(s)

McKenzie, David, Ph.D.: "A Reply to Ronald Enroth's Comment" - abstract
McKenzie, David, Ph.D.: "Teaching Students Who Already Know the Truth"

Article Index
 

 top ^

Live Search

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors.  Copyright ©1997-2008  ICSA, Inc.