Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects. Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects
articles about cults


HOMENewsMembershipConferencesWorkshopse-Library

GroupsStudy GuidesTopicsLinksPeopleOrganizationsArticlesBook Reviews

Info for:Former MembersFamiliesMental HealthResearchEducationClergyPress

CSR Journale-NewsletterBookstore

About ICSADonateContact UsHelp
 

 

 
 

Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2004

 

Persistence of “Deprogramming” Stereotypes in Film

Joseph P. Szimhart


Abstract

 

This paper reviews dramatic portrayals of deprogramming, a neologism that appeared several decades ago to identify the process of de-converting members from eccentric groups or "cults." My interest in this subject stems from experience as both a participant and observer—I made my living as a deprogrammer for over a decade until 1997. In my experience deprogramming covered an array of intervention models from non-coercive educational discussions to the imposition of dialogue after a kidnapping or involuntary confinement of a cult member. Although the vast majority of interventions were of the former model, the high drama of the latter “abduction” model as the remedy for a condition called "brainwashed" attracted media attention. By 1980 several films and television specials about coercive deprogramming were in production stages. Since 1980 a regular stream of productions has continued to represent intervention with cultists as coercive; rarely have non-coercive interventions received even cursory dramatic attention. This paper reviews significant productions through 2000 that have influenced public perception and argues that a stereotype has appeared in the public mind as a result. The paper also argues that this trend will not change because non-coercive interventions are ostensibly difficult to dramatize, lack violent interaction and therefore have little monetary potential.
 

Full text available through ICSA E-Library.


Other contributions by author(s)

Article Index
 

 top ^

Live Search

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors.  Copyright ©1997-2012  ICSA, Inc.