Cults and Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2001
Urantia: The Great Cult Mystery
Martin Gardner
Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY,
1995, 445 pages.
Reviewed by
Douglas Groothuis, Ph.D.
Several months ago I received a
call from a young radio announcer for a Christian station who wanted
information on a Christian view of UFOs and life on other planets. After a
few minutes the man reluctantly confessed that his interest was based on
The Urantia Book, a revelation that supposedly supplements, corrects,
and updates the Bible. (Urantia is what the book calls the Earth.) The
Urantia Book caused this man, despite his Christian background, to have
doubts about the orthodox teachings on Jesus. What is this Urantia Book,
and how could it so confuse someone with a Christian background? Why would
it attract anyone’s interest?
In Urantia: The Great Cult
Mystery, Martin Gardner, who has made a career out of defending science
and deflating paranormal claims, helps explain both the allure and the
deception of The Urantia Book and the religion it has spawned. He
gives us a meticulous account that traces the personalities and philosophies
that account for the supposedly supernatural revelation given in the book.
Gardner, who is a theist not associated with any particular religious
tradition, does not provide a theological assessment that compares The
Urantia Book with any normative theological system. Rather, he engages
in a sustained historical and scientific investigation of the book’s claims.
First appearing in 1955, The
Urantia Book is a mammoth tome that credits no human author. Rather, it
claims to have been assembled by extraterrestrial entities, or “Revelators,”
with ostentatious names such as Perfector of Wisdom, Number, Divine
Counselor, and One Without Name, and channeled by one unidentified human.
The 2097-page volume gives a fantastically convoluted and obscure account of
cosmology, anthropology, theology, and history. Yet, in this opacity lies
much of its fascination. Students of the book claim that they have received
an esoteric dispensation that eludes the masses. Because of the book’s sheer
bulk, it supplies endless details on cosmology, theology, and anthropology
not mentioned in other religious scriptures. Herein lies its putative
superiority. Under the leadership of the Urantia Foundation in Chicago, the
book has gone through 11 printings in the United States, with translations
in Spanish and Finnish appearing in 1993. Work is being done on Russian and
Dutch editions, and there are plans for other languages as well. My search
of the Internet yielded several home pages dedicated to spreading the gospel
according to The Urantia Book.
The relatively small number of
Urantia devotees, despite their idiosyncratic beliefs, are not to be
considered cultists in a pejorative sociological sense. Unlike other groups
with similar teachings, it does not have an authoritarian structure of
leadership, nor do its followers typically engage in high-pressure
proselytizing. The main appeal is intellectual. Religious activities are
largely based on studying The Urantia Book. Despite these
qualifications, the book itself leaves much to be desired as a suitable
object of religious instruction and veneration.
To attempt to fathom The
Urantia Book, one must descend into a dark and foreboding labyrinth of
quirky terminology, pseudoscientific pronouncements, and revisionist ideas
about Jesus. In barest outline, the book informs us that God is a “Trinity
of Trinities,” that humans are “unfallen” beings who have a divine spark
within them (called a “Thought Adjuster”), that they can become fused with
God through evolutionary development, and that Jesus’ death on the cross did
not atone for human sin against God. To summarize, it is a kind of space age
Gnosticism claiming to update orthodox Christianity.
Gardner notes that one of the
book’s more objectionable anthropological claims is that the black (or
“indigo”) race was the most inferior; although it claims that these people
“have exactly the same standing before the celestial power as any other
earthly race.” Gardner observes that this “is exactly what southerners in
the United States, including their ministers, used to say about the African
American slaves.” This revelation will certainly fail to endear potential
converts who are African or African American.
Gardner’s well-researched
conclusion is that The Urantia Book lacks any supernatural
credibility. Its contents can be explained on the basis of purely
terrestrial authors; its scientific claims were either common knowledge at
the time or plain wrong; and it contains numerous plagiarisms (even stealing
from Bertrand Russell). Urantia: The Great Cult Mystery is the most
exhaustive critique of the movement yet published. It will help readers to
understand many patterns of deception found in many other new religious
groups as well.