Stockholm Syndrome
Time
Laura Fitzpatrick
August 31, 2009
Time and again during the 18 harrowing years she allegedly
spent in captivity, Jaycee Lee
Dugard must have had the chance to cry for help. She assisted her
alleged abductor, Phillip Garrido, with his home business, sorting out orders
by phone or e-mail. She occasionally greeted customers alone at the door. She
even went out in public. But she apparently never made a run for it, returning
each day instead to a shed in the backyard of the man who allegedly kidnapped
and raped her. "Jaycee has strong feelings with this guy," her
stepfather, Carl Probyn — who saw Dugard snatched at the age of 11 from a
bus stop in 1991 — said Aug. 28. "She really feels it's almost like
a marriage." (See TIME's
top 10 famous disappearances.)
Baffling it may be, but Dugard's response to her years in
captivity is hardly unusual. Explaining it precisely is impossible, but one of
the most common theories is the so-called Stockholm syndrome, the phenomenon in
which victims display compassion for and even loyalty to their captors. It was
first widely recognized after the Swedish bank robbery that gave it its name.
For six days in August 1973, thieves Jan-Erik Olsson and Clark Olofsson held
four Stockholm bank employees hostage at gunpoint in a vault. When the victims
were released, their reaction shocked the world: they hugged and kissed their
captors, declaring their loyalty even as the kidnappers were carted off to
jail. Though the precise origin of the term Stockholm syndrome is debated, it
is often attributed to remarks during a subsequent news broadcast by the
Swedish criminologist and psychiatrist Nils Bejerot, who had assisted the
police during the robbery.
No widely accepted diagnostic criteria exist to identify
Stockholm syndrome — also known as terror-bonding or traumatic bonding
— and critics insist its apparent prevalence is largely a figment of the
media's overactive imagination. One FBI report called such close victim-captor
relationships "overemphasized, overanalyzed, overpsychologized and
overpublicized." Nonetheless, the Swedish clerks' puzzling response to
their ordeal has been emulated over and over again in a series of high-profile
cases. When heiress Patty Hearst was abducted by the Symbionese Liberation Army
in 1974, for example, she famously became their accomplice, adopting an assumed
name and abetting the radical political group in a bank robbery.
A decade later, shortly after TWA Flight 847 took off from
Athens, Greece, in 1985, two gun-toting terrorists forced their way into the
cockpit, demanding that the plane touch down in Lebanon. Once on the ground,
they held passengers captive, threatened them with guns and murdered one
hostage, dumping his body onto the tarmac. Nonetheless, after the captives were
rescued, one of them reportedly later said of his captors: "They weren't
bad people; they let me eat, they let me sleep, they gave me my life."
Victims held captive for brief but intense periods aren't the
only ones to display curiously positive feelings for the perpetrators. Shawn
Hornbeck, a Missouri boy kidnapped and held captive by pizzeria worker Michael
Devlin in 2002 for more than four years, identified himself as Shawn Devlin
when he contacted the police to report a stolen bike just 10 months after his
abduction — using his captor's name and giving no hint of what had
happened. In an interview aired on CBS the year after Hornbeck was freed, the
reporter noted that the boy's parents had requested that Shawn not be asked why
he never spoke up.
Natascha Kampusch's story is perhaps even more troubling. The
Austrian girl was abducted at age 10 and held for eight years in a windowless
cellar by her abductor, Wolfgang Priklopil. She ran away in August 2006. Yet
upon learning that he had thrown himself in front of a train a few hours after
she escaped, she reportedly burst into tears. "All I can say is that, bit
by bit, I feel more sorry for him," Kampusch said in a 2007 documentary
intended to mark her first year of freedom, calling Priklopil a "poor soul
— lost and misguided." (Experts note that because they are
especially vulnerable and impressionable, children may be particularly prone to
forming bonds with their captors, a phenomenon that may differ from Stockholm
syndrome in adults.) Victims generally stand a good chance of recovering from
Stockholm syndrome, mental-health experts say, but the prognosis and road to
recovery depend on the nature and intensity of the hostage situation and the
victim's individual way of coping.
But as critics of Stockholm syndrome maintain, these captives
were the exceptions. According to a 2007 FBI report, 73% of victims displayed
no signs of such affection for their abductors. Nonetheless, crisis negotiators
often actually try to encourage captor-hostage bonding by telling perpetrators
about the victims' families or personal lives. Being viewed as a fellow human
being, the theory goes, may be a victim's best hope for staying alive. Which
means Dugard's apparent reluctance to attempt an escape may ultimately have
been her ticket to freedom.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1919757,00.html